Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 Ala. 691

93 So 546

Holmes v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1922

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1922-06-01

Relies on Gray v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1922-06-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1954

3 state decisions

101922193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PEB CUBIA'M.

¶1 The trial court refused to sign the bill of exceptions, and so indorsed on July 30, 1921. The application to establish same was not made to this court until December 16, 1921, more than 60 days after the refusal of the trial judge to approve and sign the same. This is a case which falls under the influence of section 3021 of the Code of 1907, and which said section was not amended or repealed by the Act of 1915, page 816. Sovereign Camp v. Ward, 200 Ala. 19, 75 South. 331. Said section 3021 provides that, when the judge fails or refuses to sign a bill of exceptions, the application to establish the same must be filed in the Supreme Court within 60 days from the refusal or failure of such judge to sign said bill. The application here was not so filed and the motion to establish the bill of exceptions must be overruled, which is accordingly done.

¶2 As there is no bill of exceptions in this case and no reversible error appealing upon the record proper, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

¶3 Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYBE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.
/207/ala/691 · .json · Public domain