State v. Davolt’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
155 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons (2005), State v. Glassel (2005)
155 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A The county attorney shall bring a criminal prosecution against a juvenile in the same manner as an adult if the juvenile is fifteen, sixteen or seventeen years of age at the time the alleged offense is committed and the juvenile is accused of any of the following offenses: 1. First degree murder in violation of § 13-1105. 2. Second degree murder in violation of § 13-1104. 3. Forcible sexual assault in violation of § 13-1406. 4. Armed robbery in violation of § 13-1904. 5. Any other violent felony offense. 6. Any felony offense committed by a chronic felony offender. 7. Any offense that is properly joined to an offense listed in this subsection.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) The expert's scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The test of whether a person is an expert is whether a jury can receive help on a particular subject from the witness. The degree of qualification goes to the weight given the testimony, not its admissibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.