Dunham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1961
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tiner v. State · Tiner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * relates to cases where two or more persons are jointly concerned in the commission of any crime * * *. This statute has no application, as appellant is not jointly charged with any other person and she was not called as a witness against any other person. * * She was convicted on the voluntary statement made by her at the coroner's inquest, which, as we have already stated, was admissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rowe v. State“`* * * * nor shall any person be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rowe v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.