Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Ark. 536 - Lienhart v. Bruton

Lienhart v. Bruton’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 1983
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 1983

16 state decisions

4019441950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wiseman v. Phillips · Yarbrough v. Beardon and Phillips v. Foreman · Ferguson v. Hudson · Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. West Memphis Power & Water Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that a litigant can question a statute’s validity only when and insofar as it is being, or is about to be, applied to his disadvantage. Wiseman v. Phillips, 191 Ark. 63 , 84 S. W. 2d 91 ; Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. West Memphis Power & Water Co., 184 Ark. 206 , 41 S. W. 2d 755 ; Ferguson v. Hudson, 143 Ark. 187 , 220 S. W. 306 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.