Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 1969
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Underwood v. State · Middleton v. State · Edmonds v. State · National Life & Accident Insurance v. Blanton · Bennett and Holiman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“4‘Testimony of accomplice: A conviction cannot be had in any case of felony upon the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows that the offense was committed, and the circumstances thereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nolen v. State“4 4 The corroborating testimony required by this statute must be of a substantial character which, of itself and independently of the statement of the accomplice, tends in some degree to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime, although such evidence need not in itself be sufficient to support a conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nolen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.