Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Ark. 724 - Samples v. Grady

Samples v. Grady’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Starnes v. Sadler (1963), Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. Leathers (2003)

55 state decisions

130194419501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farrell v. Oliver · Gladish v. Lovewell · Griffin v. Rhoton · McCarroll, Commr. of Revs. v. Gregory-Robinson-Speas · Lee County v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Constitution (art. 16, § 13) provides that ‘any citizen of any county, city or town may institute suit in behalf of himself and all others interested, to protect the inhabitants thereof against the enforcement of any illegal exactions whatever.’ ” “This court has construed that provision to mean that a misapplication by a public official of funds arising from taxation constitutes an exaction from the taxpayers and empowers any citizen to maintain a suit to prevent such a misapplication of funds.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “í < There is eminent authority for holding, even in the absence of an express provision of the Constitution, such as referred to above, that a remedy is afforded in equity to taxpayers to prevent misapplication of public funds on the theory that the taxpayers are the equitable owners of public funds and that their liability to replenish the funds exhausted by the misapplication entitle them to relief against such misapplication.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.