In Re Chavis’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2015
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Toibb v. Radloff · Gaertner v. Claude (In Re Claude) · In Re Dealey · In Re LaBelle · Casarow v. Evans (In Re Evans)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“right to receive ... a payment ... on account of personal bodily injury,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kollar v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.