Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 BR 981 - Coan v. Hutter (In Re Hutter)

Coan v. Hutter (In Re Hutter)’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2016

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 706 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant’s failure to obey the orders of this court supports the trustee’s argument that he is attempting to impede the administration of this case by deferring the payment of debts owed to a taxing authority since 1990 and secured creditors since 1991. That explanation is buttressed by the observation that the onset of the defendant’s alleged symptoms routinely coincided with the dates of court ordered medical examinations. He simply declined to attend and then offered the excuse that he was too ill to travel. Accordingly, judgment will enter in favor of the trustee.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “... a long series of coordinated attempts by the debtor and her husband ... to hinder and delay their secured creditors in the Connecticut court system, and then, when the Connecticut Supreme Court denied their petition for certification, they continued those efforts in this court by repeated attempts to obstruct the bankruptcy process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.