Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 CALAPP2D 780 - Necessary v. Necessary

Necessary v. Necessary’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 109 Cal. App. 2d 917 - Baratti v. Baratti · Rehfuss v. Rehfuss · Garcia v. Garcia · Aldrich v. Aldrich · Rhea v. Millsap

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`In a matter in which an issue is tried on affidavits, the rule on appeal is that those affidavits favoring the contentions of the prevailing party establish not only the facts stated therein but also all facts which reasonably may be inferred therefrom. [Citation.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.