Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 CALAPP3D 998 - Boyle v. Sweeney

Boyle v. Sweeney’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 7 Cal. 3d 603 - Spangler v. Memel · 71 Cal. 2d 261 - Kistler v. Vasi · 200 Cal. App. 3d 224 - Ziegler v. Barnes · 170 Cal. App. 3d 499 - Long v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No deficiency judgment shall lie in any event after any sale of real property for failure of the purchaser to complete his contract of sale, or under a deed of trust, or mortgage, given to the vendor to secure payment of the balance of the purchase price of real property, or under a deed of trust, or mortgage, on a dwelling for not more than four families given to a lender to secure repayment of a loan which was in fact used to pay all or part of the purchase price of such dwelling occupied, entirely or in part, by the purchaser.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In the context of a subordination clause, the amount of the construction loan is usually extremely large. The typical vendor cannot raise the sums needed to buy at the senior sale and thereby protect his or her junior interest. The only possible protection available to the vendor is to allow a deficiency judgment against the developer-purchaser.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the success of the commercial development depends upon the competence, diligence and good faith of the developing purchaser”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.