People v. Castro’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 18 Cal. 3d 889 - People v. DeVaughn · 27 Cal. 3d 519 - People v. Pompa-Ortiz · 22 Cal. 3d 891 - People v. Lilienthal · 67 Cal. 2d 272 - People v. Laudermilk · 24 Cal. 4th 789 - People v. Mazurette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'concedes that the prosecution possesses legally admissible evidence sufficient to prove defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt' " ( Egbert, supra , 59 Cal.App.4th at p. 508 , 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 913 , citing People v. Turner (1985) 171 Cal.App.3rd 116, 125, 214 Cal.Rptr. 572 ), it "waives any right to raise questions regarding the evidence, including its sufficiency or admissibility, even if the claim of evidentiary error is based on constitutional violations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alwien“reasonably constitutional, jurisdictional, or other grounds going to the legality of the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Alwien
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.