Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 CONN 217 - Blake v. Blake

Blake v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

135
cited by 135 later decisions
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

135 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Joly (1991), Blake v. Blake (1989)

135 state decisions

77019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Juvenile Appeal v. Commissioner of Children & Youth Services · 13 Conn. App. 300 - O'Neill v. O'Neill · Yontef v. Yontef · Tobey v. Tobey · Stoner v. Stoner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bound to consider the child's present best interests and not what would have been in her best interests at some previous time.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In making a determination of custody . . . the trial court is bound to consider the child's present best interests and not what would have been in her best interests at some previous time. . . . [T]he court must . . . take account of the parents' past behavior, since it must evaluate their present and future parenting ability and the consistency of their parenting for the purpose of determining which parent will better foster the children's growth, development and well-being.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"A property division ought to accord value to those nonmonetary contributions of one spouse which enable the other spouse to devote substantial effort to paid employment which, in turn, enables the family to acquire tangible marital assets. The investment of human capital in homemaking has worth and should be evaluated in a property division incident to a dissolution of marriage. We hold, accordingly, that an equitable distribution of property should take into consideration the plaintiff's contributions to the marriage, including homemaking activities and primary caretaking responsibilities."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.