Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.1d 18 - Stevens v. McClaughry

Stevens v. McClaughry’s Empirical Analysis

207 F. 18 · 1913

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
August 1961
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1961 · most notably Frank v. Mangum (1915), Morgan v. Devine (1915)

11 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

60191319201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Lange · Bain Jr · Royall · Ex Parte Nielsen · Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The principle upon which the decisions in these cases rests is that two or more separate offenses which are committed at the same time and are parts of a single continuing criminal act, inspired by the same criminal intent which is essential to each offense, are susceptible to but one punishment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.