Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.2d 227 - Richards v. Matthews

Richards v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis

207 F.2d 227 · 1953

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 1986
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 1986

10 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

901953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. Reilly · Christopher Strassheim v. Milton Daily · Ledbetter v. United States · Munsey v. Clough · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * there are some things which courts cannot and will not do in a proceeding such as this one. We will not consider the guilt or innocence of the accused. We will not try any issues in the criminal case. We will not construe any * * * [Maryland] statutes. We will not inquire into the validity of the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.