Miles v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
207 F.2d 284 · 1953
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently September 1992 · most notably Hoffman v. Halden (1959), Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShane (1964)
36 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Collins v. Hardyman · United States v. Harris · Love v. Chandler · Hardyman v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]o be valid the act must be held to apply only to deprivation of federal rights. If it be so construed as to include deprivation of purely state rights, it would not seem to be within the Constitution.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““In this situation it was wholly immaterial whether the court dismissed the claim because it was insufficient to state a federal cause of action or whether, believing such to be the ease, it dismissed the cause because it had no jurisdiction of the nonfederal action. Obviously, however, plaintiff’s rights on appeal would exist in either instance.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wood v. Dennis““Obviously before any liability will attach under this section, the acts complained of must have been done under color of authority of the state. Yet we find in the complaint no averment that defendants actually acted under color of any such prerogatives.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.