Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.2d 361 - Riverview Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Riverview Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

207 F.2d 361 · 1953

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
May 1984
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 1984 · most notably United States v. Borin (1954), Farrand Optical Co. v. United States (1963)

18 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2101953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Commissioner v. Sunnen · Bull v. United States · United States v. Shaw · Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The meat subsidy payments were not mere gratuities or bounties but were articulated with the price control program and operated as compensatory in nature so as to validate a lower level of maximum meat prices than otherwise would have been permissible under the Emergency Price Control Act. Meat slaughterers who qualified under the subsidy regulations thus were entitled to the subsidy as a matter of right and not of grace.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Likewise it is settled that determinations by Reconstruction Finance Corporation invalidating subsidy claims, even though informally expressed, are orders issued under section 2(e) of the Emergency Price Control Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.