Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 F.2d 414

Docket No. 11051.

Sigman v. Van Gilder

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Sept. 18, 1953.

Decided Oct. 7, 1953.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-10-07

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1956

3 federal appellate ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on Sigman v. Van Gilder

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-10-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Francis E. Marshall, Philadelphia, Pa. (Thomas E. Comber, Jr., and Pepper, Bo-dine, Stokes & Hamilton, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

¶2Laurence H. Eldredge, Philadelphia, for VanGilder.

¶3Thomson F. Edwards, Philadelphia, Pa., for Harry Sigman, third party defendant.

¶4O. Jacob Tallman, Allentown, Pa., Attorneys for Appellee.

¶5Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Careful consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties convinces us that the trial in the court below was devoid of error. The questions presented were primarily those for the jury and the triers of the facts had ample evidence upon which to render their verdict. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below, 115 F.Supp. 366, will be affirmed.

/207/f2d/414 · .json · Public domain