Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.2d 489 - Seligmann v. Commissioner

Seligmann v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
October 1976
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently October 1976 · most notably Wright v. Commissioner (1976), Wright v. Commissioner (1974)

39 federal appellate · 1 district ·

260195319601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 22

Relies on Helvering v. Horst · Commissioner v. Smith · Helvering v. Bruun · Baker Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We would think that the regrettable situation which has developed could have been avoided by making petitioner a party to the proceeding in the Tax Court between the Commissioner and the husband so that the rights of both parties could have been adjudicated at the same time.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In the ease of a husband described in section 22 (k), amounts includible under section 22 (k) in the gross income of his wife, payment of which is made within the husband’s taxable year. * * * ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Section 22(a) of the Revenue Act is broad enough to include in taxable income any economic or financial benefit * * *, whatever the form or mode by which it is effected.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.