Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 F.2d 772

Docket No. 14087.

Steinberg v. United States

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 5, 1953.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-11-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1964

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Kremen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-11-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard Gladstein, of Gladstein, Andersen & Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Lloyd H. Burke, U. S. Atty., Robert EL Schnaeke, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard EL Foster, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5It appearing that there was evidence before the district court that Steinberg is a person likely to attempt to leave the jurisdiction of the district court, we find there was no abuse of discretion in fixing his bail at $35,000.00.

¶6The order appealed from, 114 F.Supp. 899, is affirmed.

/207/f2d/772 · .json · Public domain