Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 F.2d 784

Docket No. 11755.

Perryman v. United States

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 12, 1953.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-10-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1953

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Huckaby v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Harry Jamerson, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

¶2Millsaps Fitzhugh, U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN,’ McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This appeal has been considered on the record and on the briefs of the respective attorneys for the appellant and the ap-pellee ;

¶6And it appearing, upon the basis of the findings of fact of the district judge, which are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and upon the grounds stated in his conclusions of law, based upon supporting authority, notably Huekaby v. United States, .5 Cir., 196 F.2d 307, that proper conclusions of law were drawn;

¶7The judgment of the district court sustaining the motion of the United States for summary judgment in its behalf and for a dismissal of appellant’s complaint is affirmed.

/207/f2d/784 · .json · Public domain