Hart v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
207 F.2d 813 · 1953
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2010
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson · Markham v. Allen · Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. · Penn General Casualty Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Schnader
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““when * * * the United States withdrew from the state court proceedings before trial and did, as it had a perfect right to do under special statute, — go into a federal court to establish its tax claim, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1345 , that it was estopped from doing so because it had, by voluntary intervention, once called the state court’s attention to the existence of its claim to the res.” Id. at 817 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.