Paul Verhoeven As Parent and Next Friend of Paul Verhoeven Minor Donna Verhoeven As Parent and Next Friend of Paul Verhoeven Minor v. Brunswick School Committee’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
28 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably 340 F. Supp. 2d 603 - Wagner v. BOARD OF EDUC., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD. (2004), 584 F. Supp. 2d 219 - Millay Ex Rel. YRM v. Surry School Department (2008)
28 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Honig v. Doe · McDonald v. George Meany Center for Labor Studies · Susquenita School District v. Raelee S. ex rel. Heidi S. · Doe v. Brookline School Committee · Arnold Baker Farms Arnold Baker Farms v. United States Farmers Home Administration Arnold & Baker Farms
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“during the pendency of any proceedings conducted pursuant to this section, unless the State or local educational agency and the parents otherwise agree, the child shall remain in the then-current educational placement of the child . . . .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provides that the interim placement during proceedings challenging the child’s regular placement shall be the child’s current educational placement, “unless the ... educational agency and the parents otherwise agree.” ... Nothing in section 1415(j) requires the parties to “otherwise agree” on a particular interim placement for the exception to apply; the exception apparently may apply if the parties “otherwise agree” to let a third party decide the interim placement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is designed to preserve the status quo pending resolution of administrative and judicial proceedings under the [IDEA]. The preservation of the status quo ensures that the student remains in the last placement that the parents and the educational authority agreed to be appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.