Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.3d 1086 - United States v. Plumley

United States v. Plumley’s Empirical Analysis

207 F.3d 1086 · 2000

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States of America Leon Howard Jr United States of America John Robinson (2000), United States v. Petersen (2002)

9 federal appellate · 1 district ·

210200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · United States v. Young · United States v. Dunnigan · Epps v. West · Hetzel v. Prince William County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether an act or omission constitutes relevant conduct is a factual determination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “into the gray zone between clearly acceptable and clearly unacceptable advocacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.