Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.3d 491 - Rd Jones v. Thuworn Shields

Rd Jones v. Thuworn Shields’s Empirical Analysis

207 F.3d 491 · 2000

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Johnson v. Blaukat (2006), Sutton

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

260200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Siegert v. Gilley · Johnson v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “administration of [pepper spray] in this prison setting resulted in de minimis injury for Eighth Amendment purposes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “consider[ing] the extent of the pain inflicted in order to determine whether a constitutional deprivation has occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A court evaluating a claim of qualified immunity `must first determine whether the plaintiff has alleged the deprivation of an actual constitutional right at all, and if so, proceed to determine whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Sutton

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.