Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 F.3d 852 - United States v. Hudson

United States v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

207 F.3d 852 · 2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
January 2011
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · Koskela v. King County · United States v. Plunkett · United States v. Pena · United States v. Lowenstein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at the time of the initial sentencing.” However, § 3565 was amended in 1994 to omit that qualifying language. Now, the statute authorizes the court to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.