Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681A · 15 U.S.C. § 1681E · 15 U.S.C. § 1681I · 15 U.S.C. § 1681N · 15 U.S.C. § 1681O · 15 U.S.C. § 1681S
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Scott v. Harris · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · Tw Electrical Service Inc Nn v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] reasonable jury could find that, in preparing a background investigation report for [the plaintiff] which included convictions pertaining to an individual with a different first name from a different state, [the defendant] created 'an unjustifiably high risk of harm ... so obvious that it should [have been] known.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.