Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 FSUPP3D 708 - United States v. Romero-Medrano

United States v. Romero-Medrano’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
April 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Stansbury v. California · Berghuis v. Thompkins · Berghuis v. Thompkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the length of the questioning; (2) the location of the questioning; (3) the accusatory, or non-accusatory nature of the questioning; (4) the amount of restraint on the individual's physical movement; and (5) statements made by officers regarding the individual's freedom to move or leave.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The awareness of the person being questioned by an officer that he has become the 'focal point' of the investigation, or that the police already have ample cause to arrest him, may well lead him to conclude , as a reasonable person , that he is not free to leave.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]ourts have found a reasonable person less likely to perceive restraint when he arrives at an anticipated law enforcement checkpoint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.