Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Ga. App. 472 - Humphrey v. State

207 Ga. App. 472 - Humphrey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2019

24 state decisions

90199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Timberlake v. State · Smith v. State · Bell v. State · Banks v. State · 196 Ga. App. 163 - Shelton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since appellant contended that no rape occurred, any evidence showing a 'reasonable probability' that the prosecutrix had made other false accusations would certainly be the strongest defense available to him; thus it cannot be said that the failure to adhere to the Smith rule was harmless error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`not cumulative, even though it was substantially the same as the defendant's own testimony, because it provided support for the defendant's theory, support which otherwise was completely lacking in the case.' [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence is not merely cumulative, though it may have some bearing upon the main issue in controversy, if it relates to new, distinct, and material facts about which no witness testified at the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.