Hartley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tarvestad v. State · Moore v. State · Booker v. State · Johnson v. State · Lavender v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a witness may testify as to what he saw and heard in the defendant's presence ( Reeves v. State, 194 Ga. App. 539, 540 ( 391 SE2d 35 )) even where the [out-of-court declarant] does not testify and is not available for cross-examination. . . . See Reeves, supra; Sosebee v. State, 190 Ga. App. 746, 750 ( 380 SE2d 464 ); Chambers v. State, 183 Ga. App. 874 ( 360 SE2d 438 ); Green v. State, 175 Ga. App. 849 ( 335 SE2d 4 ); Latimore v. State, 170 Ga. App. 848 ( 318 SE2d 722 ); Henderson v. State, 170 Ga. App. 482 ( 317 SE2d 343 ); see Broome v. State, [supra at 540].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When the defendant does not testify, such evidence is obviously admissible if it is an admission or confession, it is certainly admissible when the defendant testifies and is subject to cross-examination[,] or when it is in the nature of res gestae.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.