Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 Ill. 410

Frier v. Lowe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1904

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1904-02-17

<p>Freehold—;freehold not1involved in ordinary petition to sell land to pay debts. A freehold is not involved in an ordinary petition by an administrator to sell land to pay debts of the decedent unless the title to the real estate is put in issue.</p>

Relies on Lynn v. Lynn · Fields v. Coker

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1904-02-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1950

5 state decisions

20190419101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Wilkin

¶1delivered the opinion of the court:

¶2This was a petition by the appellant, as administrator de bonis non of the estate of Charles Kopf, deceased, in the county court of Gallatin county, to sell real estate which it was alleged the deceased died seized of, .to pay debts probated and allowed against his estate. A demurrer was sustained to the petition on the single ground that the administrator was appointed administrator de bonis non whereas he should have been appointed administrator de bonis non with the will annexed, the deceased having died testate.

¶3Without entering upon a consideration of the merits of the case, the appeal must' be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court. It is difficult to perceive why an appeal should have been taken directly to this court from the county court in view of our former decisions holding that in an ordinary petition to sell real estate to pay debts no freehold is involved, (Fields v. Coker, 161 Ill. 186,) and that it is only in cases where, upon such a "petition, the title to real estate is put in issue that this court can entertain jurisdiction on a direct appeal. (Lynn v. Lynn, 160 Ill. 307; Richie v. Cox, 188 id. 276.) The appeal in this case should have been taken to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District.

¶4Appeal dismissed.

/207/ill/410 · .json · Public domain