Broad v. Broad

Decided July 19, 1917

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1917-07-19

<p>Interlocutory appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Thomson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court.</p>

Reversed · Decided 1917-07-19

Mr. Justice McDonald

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Receivers, § 2* — when appointment of receiver to protect interest in property is unnecessary. The appointment of a receiver in a suit for a divorce to protect the husband’s interest in property in the wife’s name, and which she owns jointly with a third person, is unnecessary where, upon proper showing, the wife could have been enjoined from disposing or incumbering her interest therein during the pendency of the suit.