Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Ind. 240 - McErlain, Tr. v. Taylor

McErlain, Tr. v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
November 1994
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 1994

23 state decisions

801934194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Heckler v. Conter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled that the constitutional provisions involved do not forbid a classification of persons for legislative purposes. `But in such cases the classification must not be capricious or arbitrary, but must be just and reasonable, and based upon substantial distinctions germane to the subject matter and the object to be obtained. The distinctions must involve something more than mere characteristics which will serve to divide or identify the class. There must be inherent differences in situation related to the subject-matter of the legislation which require, necessitate or make expedient different or exclusive legislation with respect to the members of the class. The classification must embrace all who possess the attributes or characteristics which are the basis of the classification, and their difference from those excluded must be substantial and related to the purpose of the legislation.' Henry Heckler v. Herman L. Conter, Treas. et al. (1933), 206 Ind. 376, 381 , 187 N.E. 878 ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.