Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Ind. 65 - State Ex Rel. Harry v. Ice

State Ex Rel. Harry v. Ice’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
9
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2010 · most notably Brown v. Grzeskowiak (1951), 323 So. 2d 259 - Boardman v. Esteva (1975)

38 state decisions

120193419401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. State · Blue v. Allee · Hord ex rel. Stanley v. Elliott · Noble v. City of Vincennes · Remster v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that provisions of the election law viewed as mandatory, if enforcement is sought before election in a direct proceeding, will be held directory only in a proceeding after the election unless an essential element of the election is affected, or there is an express declaration in the statute that the act is essential to a valid election, or that its omission will render the election void.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The purpose of the law and the efforts of the court are to secure to the elector an opportunity to freely and fairly cast his ballot, and to uphold the will of the electorate and prevent disfranchisement. In the absence of fraud, actual or suggested, statutes will be liberally construed to accomplish this purpose.” (Our italics).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.