Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Kan. 152 - State v. Campbell

State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably State v. Johnson (1977), State v. Richard (1984)

47 state decisions

2401971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · State v. Jones · State v. Poulos · State v. Law · Peterson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A new trial should not be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence unless the district court is satisfied the evidence would probably produce a different verdict, and the credibility of the evidence offered in support of the motion is for the district court’s consideration. Our appellate review of the order denying a new trial is limited to whether the district court abused its discretion.” (p. 154.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.