Daugharthy v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1981
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bingham v. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc. · Smithson v. Dunham · Newman v. Case · Harbaugh v. Darr · Kirsch v. Dondlinger & Sons Construction Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No. 14 “It is undisputed that the place where this collision occurred was on private property and not on a public highway or street. Only such traffic laws of Kansas as are specifically applicable off the public highways are applicable at the place of collision. The owner of the real propery where the collision occurred had the right to regulate the use and set up the conditions for the use of the property by persons permitted on the premises. Such owner also had the duty to inform persons permitted on the premises of such regulations and conditions. No person permitted on the premises had the right to assume that others on the premises would abide by or had knowledege of any such regulations and conditions set up by the owner of the premises. “No. 16 “A pedestrian is any person afoot. “There is no provision in the statutory laws of Kansas governing the conduct of a pedestrian at the time and place of the collision. “No. 17 “The statutory laws of Kansas applicable at the place and time of the collision provide: “(a) That no person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing. In every event speed shall be so controlled as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle, or other conveyance in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care. “(b) In addition the law provides that the driver of every vehicle shall drive at an appropriate reduced speed when special hazard e”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klaus v. Goetz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.