State v. Boyle’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

61 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[Ojnce the mandate of Miranda is complied with at the threshold of the interrogation by law enforcement officers, the warnings need not be repeated at the beginning of each successive interview. To adopt an automatic second warning system would be to add a perfunctory ritual to police procedures rather than provide the meaningful set of procedural safeguards envisioned by Miranda. [Citations omitted.]” State v. Boyle, 207 Kan. 833, 841 , 486 P.2d 849 (1971).”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Mattox · State v. Riedel

2. ““Where ‘exigent circumstances’ . . . exist the business of policemen is to act, not to speculate or meditate on whether the report is correct. People could well die in emergencies if police tried to act with the calm deliberation associated with judicial process . . . .” ( 207 Kan. at 839 .)”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 2 Kan. App. 2d 38 - State v. Jones · 2 Kan. App. 2d 592 - State v. Harrington

3. ““The quantum of information which constitutes probable cause — evidence which would warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a felony has been committed — must be measured by the facts of the particular case. (Carroll v. United States, 267 U. S. 132 , 69 L. Ed. 543 , 45 S. Ct. 280 , 39 A.L.R. 790 .)””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Lasley