Axton v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Ross (1926), Baxter v. Hubbard (1932)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Spalding v. Mason · Aetna Life Insurance v. Bethel · Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Humphrey · Lewis Curtis v. John Innerarity · Henderson Cotton Manufacturing Co. v. Lowell Machine Shops
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The hypothetical question grouping therein the facts forming the premises upon which the answer of the witnesses must be based must include no facts, not shown by some of the testimony to have existed ;• nor must it omit any relative fact shown by some of' the testimony to have existed.” Axton case supra. [ 207 Ky. 280 , 269 S. W. 536 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vogt v. Keller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.