Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Md. 212 - DeBoy v. Harris

DeBoy v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
5
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 1983

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 16 state decisions

1101955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · 76 N.J. Eq. 592 - Jackson v. Hooper · Elsbach v. Mulligan · 115 Cal. App. 238 - San Francisco Iron & Metal Co. v. American Milling & Industrial Co. · 68 So. 2d 163 - Donahue v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We may assume that if the plan were shown to be illegal, untra vires or fraudulent, it might be set aside by a court of equity. Shaw v. Davis, 78 Md. 308, 316 [ 28 A. 619, 621 ]. We may also assume that an equity court may set aside a transaction whereby majority stockholders use their voting power for their own benefit, for some ulterior purpose adverse to the interests of the corporation and its stockholders as such. Cooperative Milk Service v. Hepner, 198 Md. 104, 114 , 81 A.2d 219, 224 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.