Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Mont. 96 - Shackleton v. Neil

Shackleton v. Neil’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2018

18 state decisions

801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Air West, Inc. · Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana · States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Philippine Air Lines, a Corporation, and Qantas Airways, a Corporation · State Savings Bank v. Albertson · Yetter v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or of any claim against him . . .” (Emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A rule of thumb as to the meaning of the abuse of discretion standard provides that the trial court’s exercise of discretion should not be disturbed unless there is a ‘definite and firm conviction that the court below committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon a weighing of the relevant factors.’””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) [T]he appellant's right to a hearing on its claim, (2) the impairment of the appellees' defenses presumed from the unreasonable delay, (3) the wholesome policy of the law in favor of the prompt disposition of law suits, and (4) the duty of the appellant to proceed with due diligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.