Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Neb. 174 - Lovelace v. Stern

Lovelace v. Stern’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2024

18 state decisions

12019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tilden v. Beckmann · Sopcich v. Tangeman · Olds v. Jamison · Frank McGill, Inc. v. Nucor Corp. · Traudt v. Nebraska Public Power District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Parol evidence is generally admissible when it is offered for the purpose of explaining and showing the true nature of the transaction between the parties. [Citation omitted.] In any event, this court has ordinarily applied the parol evidence rule only in the absence of fraud, mistake, or ambiguity. [Citationomitted]. A written instrument is open to explanation by parol evidence when its terms are susceptible to two constructions or where the language employed is vague or ambiguous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]s a general rule, a written instrument which provides for payment of interest on an unpaid balance, but without specifying the rate, carries interest at the legal rate prescribed by law. See, Hornstein v. Cifuno, 86 Neb. 103 , 125 N.W. 136 (1910); Praest v. Quesner, 113 Neb. 485 , 203 N.W. 549 (1925); Bank v. Roberts, 168 N.C. 473 , 84 S.E. 706 (1915).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.