Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 NEB 706 - Jones v. Johnson

Jones v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2011

2 district · 12 state decisions

801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grand Island School District 2 v. Celotex Corp. · Bend v. Marsh · T. S. McShane Co. v. Dominion Construction Co. · George P. Rose Sodding & Grading Co. v. Dennis · Hamrick v. Indianapolis Humane Society, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has long been the rule that: “In this state the statute of limitations is a statute of repose; it prevents recovery on stale demands. If the petition in an action sets forth facts which show upon its face that it is barred by statute, and in avoidance thereof further facts are alleged to remove the bar of the statute, all of which are positively denied by the answer, together with the added allegations that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations, the plaintiff cannot recover without first establishing the facts so alleged in avoidance.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he point at which a statute of limitations commences to run must be determined from the facts of each case; a cause of action accrues, and the statute of limitations begins to run, when the aggrieved party has the right to institute and maintain suit, even though such plaintiff may be ignorant of the existence of the cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.