Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 N.J. 587 - Aronberg v. Tolbert

Aronberg v. Tolbert’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of Manalapan · DiProspero v. Penn · Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc. · Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Reed · Newburgh v. Arrigo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statutory language does not suggest that a claim that a victim cannot bring in life can only spring forth in the event of his death. Indeed, N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 gives the right of an heir ‘to maintain an action for damages’ only if a claim could have been brought by the decedent had he lived. In this case, Aronberg, as an uninsured driver, could not have brought a claim against the alleged tortfeasor as a consequence of the statutory bar. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.5(a). His heirs do not have any greater right than Aronberg possessed himself. [Id. at 603, 25 A.3d 1121 .] 8”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.