Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 N.J. Super. 79

504 A.2d 18

State v. Starling

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL STARLING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Submitted December 4, 1985.

Decided December 17, 1985.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · decided 1985-12-17

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1996

9 state decisions

Relies on 188 N.J. Super. 127 - State v. Starling

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before Judges KING and SCALERA.

¶2Thomas S. Smith, Acting Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Jeffrey A. Cohen, Designated Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).

¶3*80Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Jessica S. Oppenheim, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the letter brief).

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Defendant was convicted of second-degree burglary, N.J.S.A. 2C:18-2, third-degree theft, N.J.S.C.A. 2C:20-3, and unlawful possession of a firearm without a permit, N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5(b). He was sentenced to a ten-year state prison term with a three and one-half-year parole disqualifier.

¶6On this appeal he raises three issues: (1) his confession was the fruit of an illegal arrest and inadmissible, (2) his confession was involuntary and should have been suppressed, and (3) his sentence was manifestly excessive. We find issues (1) and (3) to be clearly without merit and affirm. R. 2:11-3(e)(2). On issue (2) we affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Menza's published Law Division opinion appearing at 188 N.J. Super. 127 (Law Div. 1983).

/207/njsuper/79 · .json · Public domain