Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 NW2D 266 - Cox v. Hjelle

Cox v. Hjelle’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
October 1983
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · Bell v. Burson · State v. Sinner · State v. Harm · Morrell v. Hjelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . Where the driving record of the petitioner discloses four convictions involving movement of a vehicle upon the public highways within the preceding two-year period, such driving record constitutes an emergency situation which obviates the necessity for a presuspension hearing. Suspension in such case does not contravene the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. (Citations omitted.)””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.