State v. Sinner’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1996
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Burson · Prichard v. Battle · Anderson v. Commissioner of Highways · State v. Johnson · Reese v. Kassab
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . it is fundamental that except in emergency situations (and this is not one) due process requires that when a State seeks to terminate an interest such as that here involved, it must afford ‘notice and opportunity for hearing appropriate to the nature of the case’ before the termination becomes effective. . . .” (Emphasis supplied, except as to before.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The decisions covering the issue of the constitutionality of suspending a driver’s license without a pre-suspension hearing are not in accord.” (Comparing Commonwealth Department of Public Safety v. Thomas (Ct. of App. Ky. 1971), 467 S. W. 2d 335 (1971), and Broughton v. Warren, Del. Ch. 281 Atl. 2d 625 (1971).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““7. Though administrative agency members must be zealous in the recognition and preservation of the right to a hearing by impartial triers of the facts, the combination of the prosecuting and judicial functions has not been held to violate constitutional right or deny due process of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pladson v. Hjelle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.