Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 NW2D 777 - State v. Massey

State v. Massey’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 1983
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brulotte Et Al. v. Thys Company · Shoup Voting Machine Corp. v. Datamedia Computer Service, Inc. · Moore v. United States · John C. Rastrom v. Allan L. Robbins, Warden, Maine State Prison · Kilgore v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The test is whether in all the circumstances counsel’s performance was within the range of normal competency. Moore v. United States, 432 F.2d 730, 737 (3 Cir. 1970). To warrant finding a deprivation of due process, such circumstances must include ‘an affirmative factual basis demonstrating counsel’s inadequacy of representation.’ In re Parker, 423 F.2d 1021, 1025 (8 Cir. 1970).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.