Richards v. Ernst Wiener Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. Schwartz (1928), In re Fechheimer Fisher Co. (1914)
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedRichards v. Ernst Wiener Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The contract itself, therefore, was perfectly legal subject to certain limitations upon its enforceability. If when the time came defendant had a sufficient surplus, the contract would be enforced.. If it had not, the contract could not be enforced.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““A director- of a stock corporation, wlio concurs in any vote or act of tlie directors of such corporation, or any of -them, by which it is intended: * * * (5) To apply any portion of the funds of such corporation, except surplus profits, directly or indirectly, to the purchase of shares of its own stock — is guilty of a misdemeanor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““He could resell, but for tbe provisions of tbe Penal Law.”,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.