Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

207 N.Y. 774

101 N.E 1124

Van Slochem v. . Villard

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1913

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1913-03-18

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 7, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for judgment in favor of defendants, appellants, on the pleadings in an action for fraud and deceit. The following question was certified: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1961

3 state decisions

Relies on Van Slochem v. . Villard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1913-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in Van Slochem v. Villard (207 N. Y. 587).

¶2 Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.

/207/ny/774 · .json · Public domain