¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in Van Slochem v. Villard (207 N. Y. 587).
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
207 N.Y. 774
101 N.E 1124
Decided March 18, 1913
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1913-03-18
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 7, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for judgment in favor of defendants, appellants, on the pleadings in an action for fraud and deceit. The following question was certified: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1961
3 state decisions
Relies on Van Slochem v. . Villard
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1913-03-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in Van Slochem v. Villard (207 N. Y. 587).
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.