Lawrence v. Lawrence’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1958
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Philip Carey Co. v. Vickers · Hill v. Hill · Johnson v. McDonald · Friedman v. Friedman · Hipple v. Hipple
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a proceeding under the provisions of 12 O.S.1951 § 1031, to modify a judgment for divorce and alimony by granting plaintiff an additional sum as alimony, evidence examined and held, that the judgment of the trial court awarding plaintiff an additional sum as alimony and providing for the payment by defendant of attorney’s fees for her attorneys, is not clearly against the weight of the evidence nor contrary to law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Owens v. Owens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.