Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 207 Okla. 464 - Mayor v. Weaver

Mayor v. Weaver’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. Oliver · Blackwell, Enid & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Bebout · Wallingford v. Alcorn · Whale v. Rice · McEachin v. Kinkaid

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Where it is clearly apparent from the verdict, or the verdict and instructions of the court, that the jury did not, in the assessment of the amount of the recovery, include interest, and it is further clearly apparent that the party recovering is entitled to interest in addition to the amount stated in the verdict, and the rate is fixed by lavo or made certain-by the terms of the contract, and the date from which and to which interest should be computed is clearly and unquestionably ascertainable from the face of the verdict or from uncontro-verted facts of record, the court may lawfully compute or calculate the interest, and add such sum to the amount allowed by the jury, and render judgment for the aggregate sum.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The judgment of the court must follow the verdict, and where the verdict is general and for a sum in gross, and the question of interest was not reserved by the court, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the jury omitted interest, it will be presumed that it is embraced in the amount of their finding, and the court cannot add interest to the amount found by the verdict of the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.